Skip to main content

Vampire: Love and Pain

Vampires have always had an air of sexuality to them. Whether it’s the fair, powerful, and rich man or the seductive and enchanting woman, vampires are hardly androgynous. 
In interview with a Vampire, sex is arguably the main theme. Louis describes becoming a vampire at the hands of Lestat as pleasurable as opposed to frightening. What happens soon after is significantly less pleasurable, with Louis’ human fluids forcing their way out of his body, but it was pleasant at first. Tranforming into a vampire seems to be compared to sex, or at least sexualized, which makes the transformation of Claudia at the hands of Lestat all the more creepy. 

Lestat goes from an interesting villain to Frieza from Dragon Ball Z. He just will not stay dead. I believe he returns from death at least three times, making his return less and less impactful every time. His return after Louis and Armand flee to New Orleans was hilarious at this point.  

I also found it funny how everyone wanted a piece of Lois, the punchline being the interviewer himself wanting to be transformed by Louis. This pissed of Louis and he “kills” the interviewer, which got a good laugh out of me. Here Louis is, pouring his heart out over his sexual vampire problems and the interviewer himself gets the hots for Louis. 


I understand what the story was going for. The author took the sexual origin of vampires and went all-out with it. I am not exactly a fan of the end-product, I feel that it’s really cheesy in its approach to the subject matter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Frankenstein by Mary Shelly Mary Shelly is responsible for creating one of the most recognizable horror stories of all time and for that, I highly respect her as an author. However, I'm not the biggest fan of her original writing of Frankenstein.  My opinions on Frankenstein are completely the result of me growing up in a time where this story has been re-told and parodied countless times. I enjoy the tale of Frankenstein in its extremes; whether incredibly dark or a lighthearted parody, doesn’t matter. Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, though the original tale, simply felt boring to me. I read it before in high school and hardly remembered a thing about it. I figured I would have come around since then but nothing’s changed. I just thought it was rather boring, plain and simple. There were two moments in particular in the writing that frustrated me. The first was a potential plot hole; when Frankenstein’s Monster is giving exposition to Frankenstein he describes his life t

The New Weird

Well this is definitely weird. Railsea by China Mieville is essentially a modern-fantasy take on Moby Dick, with trains and giant moles instead of ships and giant whales. But that’s not all, this Earth exists in a world where aliens visited many years ago and now the world is polluted beyond repair, haunted by gargantuan beasts. The setting is very interesting, but I’m not super fond of all of the characters aside from Sirocco, which made Railsea very difficult to read for very long.

A Novel of Spiritual Education

I remember reading Harry Potter as a kid and not really enjoying it. I found it to be a chore but I finished it because my friends seemed to enjoy it a lot. I ended up very disappointed and watched the movies to see if I’d missed something. Though the films were good, I was still not a fan. I’ve since rewatched the movies and I’ve warmed up to Harry Potter a little bit. My main issue then was the world building. I didn’t understand the limits of what existed in the Harry Potter universe. I had many questions, such as: how are there trolls and goblins yet none of the normal people know about them? I didn’t quite understand the border between reality and fantasy within the Harry Potter universe and frankly, I still don’t.  I like certain aspects of Harry Potter, the films in particular capture some good magical moments. A famous example of capturing the magic would be the scene where Harry departs from platform 9 3/4 and enters the train to Hogwarts.